Alternating
Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen in the Febrile Child: Examination of the Evidence
Regarding Efficacy and Safety
Sheri M. Carson
Pediatr Nurs
29(5):379-382, 2003. © 2003 Jannetti Publications, Inc.
Posted 12/12/2003
Despite its frequently benign nature, the presence of
fever in children continues to spark fear in the hearts of parents and health
care practitioners alike. In fact, fever is one of the most common pediatric
problems, accounting for 25%-30% of emergency department and clinicvisits each
year (Bachur, 2001; Murphy, 1992; Wong et al., 2001). Most pediatric
specialists define fever as a rectal temperature greater than 38.0°C(100.4°F)
or an oral temperature above 37.8°C(100°F) (Hay, Groothius, Hayward, &
Levin, 1997). Fever can have a multitude of causes, including infections,
vasculitic syndromes, central nervous system disorders, neoplasms, poisonings,
immunization or drug reactions, dehydration, and heat stroke (Hay et al.,
1997). Although fever is usually acute in nature, it can be considered a
complex health problem in some children due to underlying pathology or
inability to fully predict the course or duration of the fever (Murphy, 1992).
In addition, while fever is usually self-limiting, it is considered
particularly ominous in infants less than 3 months old and in immunosuppressed
children (i.e., children with cancer or HIV/AIDS), as the risk of bacteremia is
much higher in these children (Lau, Uba, & Lehman, 2002).
Fear of fever, which is often referred to as
"fever phobia," is frequently attributed to parental concern
regarding febrile seizures, neurological sequelae, and potentially serious
underlying illness (Adam & Stankov, 1994; Kramer, Naimark, & Leduc,
1985). Unfortunately, health care practitioners also have fallen victim to
fever phobia. This has contributed to the common recommendation to parents to
intervene in the fever process by using antipyretic medications such as
acetaminophen or ibuprofen (Schmitt, 1980; Wong et al., 2001). However, due to
the potential side effects of these medications, the use of antipyretics for
the management of pediatric fever remains controversial (Greisman &
Mackowiak, 2002).
One of the most controversial practices is the use of
alternating doses of acetaminophen and ibuprofen to help control fever
(Mayoral, Marino, Rosenfeld, & Greensher, 2000; Mofenson, McFee, Caraccio,
& Greensher, 1998), which originated in the early 1970s with the
alternation of acetaminophen and aspirin (Block, 1997). The thought at this
time was that, even though both acetaminophen and aspirin produced satisfactory
reduction in temperature when given individually, the alternation of these two
medications would produce a more dramatic and sustained reduction of fever
(Steele, Yong, Bass, & Shirkey, 1972). However, when the use of aspirin was
linked with the occurrence of Reye's syndrome in children, practitioners began
to recommend alternating acetaminophen with ibuprofen instead of aspirin for
fever management. Unfortunately, this change was made without sufficient
research to support the safety or efficacy of this combined treatment regimen
(Mofenson et al., 1998).
Physicians and nurses continue to treat hospitalized
febrile children with alternating doses of acetaminophen and ibuprofen, and
parents are often encouraged to provide the same alternating treatment at home
(Mofenson et al., 1998). Yet, there has been no clinical research to verify the
efficacy or safety of this method of fever management (Bein & Heubi, 1997;
Block, 1997; Kearns, Leeder, & W asserman, 1998; Mayoral et al., 2000;
Mofenson et al., 1998). It has been suggested that this practice of alternating
acetaminophen and ibuprofen is frequently instituted as a result of
insufficient dosage amounts or inappropriate dosing schedules of acetaminophen that
produce "subtherapeutic" plasma concentrations, therefore preventing
effective antipyresis (Kearns et al., 1998). However, immense confusion can
result when parents are instructed to administer alternating doses of
acetaminophen and ibuprofen. This confusion can subsequently lead to potential
overdose. In addition, while glutathione is needed to prevent the accumulation
of acetaminophen in the renal medulla, ibuprofen inhibits glutathione
production and also blocks the production of renal prostaglandins by reducing
renal blood flow.As a result, significant tubular necrosis and renal toxicity
can occur (McIntire, Rubenstein, Gartner, Gilboa, & Ellis, 1993), which can
be even more pronounced when children are dehydrated.
In order for health care providers to ensure that
children are receiving the best and safest care possible with regard to fever
management, both in the hospital and at home, clinical practice and the advice
being given to parents needs to be grounded in solid research-based evidence.
Thus, the purpose of this article is to examine the research with regard to the
alternation of acetaminophen and ibuprofen to manage pediatric fever, and to
then make recommendations for clinical practice based on that evidence.
In febrile children, is the practice of alternating
acetaminophen and ibuprofen more effective in reducing pediatric fever than
administering either acetaminophen or ibuprofen individually, and is it safe?
A thorough search of the literature was conducted to
locate evidence regarding the alternation of acetaminophen and ibuprofen to
treat pediatric fever. Evidence-based medicine, evidenced-based nursing, the
Cochrane library, and the National Guideline Clearinghouse (www.guideline.gov) were all searched using the combined keywords
acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and fever. No systematic reviews were found that
evaluated the use of alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen in febrile infants
and children. There also were no current evidence-based practice guidelines or
protocols found. In addition, an exhaustive review of individual studies
conducted over the past 30 years was performed using the following databases:
Medline, Ovid, CINAHL, and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition. MD Consult,
the Virginia Henderson International Nursing Library, and the American Academy
of Pediatrics' Web sites also were searched using the aforementioned
combination of keywords. All searches were limited to the English language and
human subjects. In addition, studies were initially limited to infants and
children, but then expanded to include adults due to the lack of research found
on the topic. The reference lists of retrieved articles also were reviewed for
possible additional studies. Finally, the practice of alternating acetaminophen
and ibuprofen in febrile children was discussed with dozens of nurses,
residents, and attending physicians at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin in
order to determine the basis for current practice and elicit any additional
studies not previously identified. Although the search process revealed several
research articles discussing the safety and efficacy of acetaminophen versus
ibuprofen for pediatric fever management, only one study was found that
addressed the actual alternation of acetaminophen and ibuprofen in febrile
children.
Acetaminophen, also referred to as paracetamol, has
been successfully used as an effective antipyretic for years in the pediatric
population (Murphy, 1992). However, even though acetaminophen is a relatively
safe drug, there is the potential for toxic liver and renal effects due to its
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties (Adam & Stankov, 1994;
American Academy of Pediatrics [AAP], 2001). Thus, it has been recommended that
the lowest therapeutic dose that provides sufficient antipyresis should be used
in order to prevent potential toxicity or adverse side effects in children
(AAP, 2001).
The same caution should be used in the administration of
ibuprofen to febrile children, as it can also have toxic renal effects (Kelley,
Walson, Edge, Cox, & Mortensen, 1992; Plaisance, 2000). Ibuprofen was first
approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a prescribed treatment
for febrile infants and children 6 months of age or older in the 1980s (Murphy,
1992). While ibuprofen and acetaminophen are equally effective in low-grade
fever control, ibuprofen has been shown to be superior in the management of
fevers greater than 102.5°F (Walson, Galletta, Braden, & Alexander, 1989).
Some studies also have found that ibuprofen causes a greater and longer
decrease in temperature than acetaminophen does when both drugs are
administered in similar doses (Kauffman, Sawyer, & Scheinbaum, 1992; Wong et
al., 2001). Finally, when administered in age-appropriate therapeutic doses,
ibuprofen has been found to be a safe alternative to acetaminophen in pediatric
patients (Kauffman et al., 1992; Plaisance, 2000; Wong et al., 2001).
Despite the individual studies on the efficacy and
safety of acetaminophen and ibuprofen when administered as single agents, only
one study has been conducted on the practice of alternating acetaminophen and
ibuprofen in febrile children. Mayoral et al. (2000) conducted a survey of 161 health care providers
(mostly pediatricians) in order to identify current fever management strategies
and their basis for use, as well as to determine the frequency with which
acetaminophen is alternated with ibuprofen. In their study, Mayoral et al.
administered a 15-item questionnaire to self-selected physicians, nurse
practitioners, and pediatric specialists who were in attendance at selected
professional meetings. According to their findings, alternating acetaminophen
and ibuprofen in febrile children appears to be a common practice among
pediatricians and other health care providers, especially among practitioners
who have been in practice for 5 years or less. The majority of these
practitioners stated that they base their practice on recommendations by the AAP
(29%) and the opinion of mentors (26%). The remainder of the respondents cited
journal articles, The Harriet Lane Handbook, and the Physicians' Desk Reference
as their basis for practice. Interestingly, none of the respondents in this
survey cited scientific data as guiding their practice with regard to
alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen in febrile children. In addition,
despite the fact that 29% of the respondentsstated that the AAP s
recommendations were the basis for their practice, the AAP did not have
specific guidelines or recommendations on the alternation of acetaminophen and
ibuprofen in febrile children at the time Mayoral et al. conducted their
survey.
Temperatures at which practitioners decided to use
antipyretics in children varied somewhat, but the majority of practitioners
chose a temperature of 101 F as the point at which antipyretics should be
administered (Mayoral et al., 2000). Although there are a multitude of ways in
which acetaminophen and ibuprofen can be alternated, the most common method
cited was to recommend giving acetaminophen every 4 hours and ibuprofen every 6
hours. However, Mayoral et al. noted that this regimen can be confusing to
parents and can ultimately lead to double dosing. In addition, due to the
pharmacokinetics of both ibuprofen and acetaminophen, combining the two
medications in an alternating fashion may produce a synergistic effect on the
kidneys and cause renal tubular toxicity (Kelley et al., 1992).
Another problem with the practice of alternating
acetaminophen every 4 hours and ibuprofen every 6 hours is that it not only
exceeds the recommended daily doses of these medications, but it also does not
specify which antipyretic medication should be given to the child at the
twelfth hour (Mayoral et al., 2000). This poses a significant safety risk to
the child, as it increases the potential for accidental overdose or improper
medication administration. Finally, due to the lack of scientific evidence
regarding the safety and efficacy of this practice, Mayoral et al. recommend
that practitioners proceed with extreme caution when using alternating
antipyretic therapy.In addition, practitioners are encouraged to advise parents
to use one single agent to treat pediatric fever as opposed to alternating both
acetaminophen and ibuprofen (Mayoral et al., 2000).
Although practitioners continue to use alternating
doses of acetaminophen and ibuprofen, there is no scientific data supporting
the safety of this practice or its superiority over the scheduled
administration of therapeutic, age-appropriate doses of one single antipyretic
agent (Kearns et al., 1998; Mofenson et al., 1998). In fact, the FDA and
several pharmaceutical companies actually advise against this form of fever
management (Mofenson et al., 1998). In addition, even though the AAP
acknowledges the practice of alternating antipyretics, they strongly encourage
health care providers to "exercise discretion" when recommending this
method of treatment due to the lack of clinical research evidence regarding the
efficacy and safety of alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen in febrile
children (AAP, 2001, p. 1022).
Only one study was found that specifically addressed
the practice of alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen in febrile children
(Mayoral et al., 2000). However, this study did not actually test the efficacy
and safety of alternating antipyretic therapy; rather, it surveyed health care
practitioners regarding their use of antipyretics and the basis for their
practice of fever management. In their study, Mayoral et al. used a convenience
sample of health care providers who were self-selected and volunteered to
complete the questionnaire. This is a limitation of the study, as convenience
samples present a risk for selection bias, which can ultimately affect the
representativeness of the sample and threaten the external validity of the
study (Polit & Hungler, 1999). In addition, although the questionnaires for
this study were distributed at various professional meetings, it is unknown whether
these meetings occurred at the same or different sites. As a result, the
generalizability of their findings to all pediatric practitioners may be
limited.
Another weakness of the study is that the response
rate of the surveyed practitioners was not discussed, nor were the differences
between those who chose to complete the survey and those who did not. This
failure to document the nonresponse bias can introduce a significant degree of
selection bias into the study, as can the failure to note the number of
returned questionnaires that were discarded due to incomplete answers (Polit
& Hungler, 1999). In addition, the sample did not include bedside nurses.
By including the practices and beliefs of bedside nurses in their study,
Mayoral et al. (2000) would have provided a greater under-standing of the
frequency with which nurses actually alternate antipyretics in hospitalized
children. Finally, the authors used their own investigator-developed
questionnaire, but they did not include estimates of the questionnaire's
validity and reliability.
Although there were some limitations to the study,
there also were strengths. First and foremost, Mayoral et al. (2000) included a
specific question about the practice of alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen
in febrile children. In addition, the researchers had the respondents clarify
which specific alternating method they use in practice. The study also had an
adequate sample size and allowed for participant anonymity, which decreases the
potential for respondent and/or interviewer bias (Polit & Hungler, 1999).
Finally, the questionnaires were administered and collected at the same
location and on the same day.This can increase the return rate of the
questionnaires and thus improve the strength of the study.
While a number of double-blind, randomized clinical
trials have been conducted on the efficacy and safety of acetaminophen versus
ibuprofen for fever management in children, no such studies have been conducted
on the alternation of these two medications. Therefore, it is extremely
important that future clinical research address this fairly common practice. In
addition, many sources have pointed to potentially synergistic and toxic side
effects as a result of alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen in febrile
children. Thus, it is vital that health care professionals investigate the
basis for this practice and establish solid evidence regarding the efficacy and
safety of this method of fever management.
In today's era of evidence-based practice, it is vital
that health care providers strive to evaluate current practices and ensure that
they are grounded in evidence. However, as this review has shown, no evidence
currently supports the practice of alternating acetaminophen and ibuprofen in febrile
children. Instead, the practice was generated back in the 1970s with the
combination of acetaminophen and aspirin and has been passed on to subsequent
practitioners over the years.
Even though acetaminophen and ibuprofen have both been
shown to be safe and effective in reducing pediatric fevers when used
individually, nurses and other health care providers should not simply assume
that combining these two medications in an alternating fashion will be more
effective,orthatitis even safe. In addition, overreacting to pediatric fevers
by encouraging the alternation of antipyretics only further promotes fever
phobia in both parents and health care providers. While fevers can sometimes be
frightening, it is important to remember that they are usually harmless
(Grover, 1996; Murphy, 1992). In fact, fevers have often been attributed with
providing an unfavorable environment for the growth of bacterial and viral
microorganisms. As a result, the body s immune system is better able to fight
infection (Adam & Stankov, 1994).
Currently, pediatricians, nurse practitioners, and
nurses are continuing to treat pediatric fever aggressively, although the
degree of fever at which intervention is encouraged varies slightly among
practitioners (Mayoral et al., 2000). Yet, it is important to be aware of the
lack of evidence substantiating the practice of alternating acetaminophen and
ibuprofen in febrile children. Nurses are in a prime position not only to
encourage clinically-based research in this area, but also to introduce
research findings into practice. In addition, nurses can educate other health
care providers and parents about the potential dangers of alternating
acetaminophen and ibuprofen, as this practice may increase the risk for adverse
side effects.
Nurses also can advocate for the proper dosage and
dosing schedule of either acetaminophen or ibuprofen (depending on the child's
age, diagnosis, and degree of fever). Other alternative antipyretic methods
that have proven efficacy in febrile children can be incorporated into the
child's care, such as a cool environment, sponging with tepid water, adequate
hydration, and cool compresses (Adam & Stankov, 1994). Finally,it should be
remembered that the primary reason for treating a child with antipyretics
should be to minimize discomfort. If a child has a temperature of greater than
38°Cbut is comfortable, there is really no need for medication (Grover, 1996).
This is true even for children with a history of febrile seizures, as the use
of prophylactic antipyretics has unfortunately been shown to have no effect on
lowering the reoccurrence of febrile seizures (Schnaiderman, Laht,
Sheefer,& Aladjem, 1993; Van Stuijvenberg, Derksen-Lubsen, Steyerberg,
Habbema, & Moll, 1998).
Despite the long-term practice of alternating acetaminophen
and ibuprofen in the management of febrile children, this review has
demonstrated that this practice lacks an evidence base. Thus, the alternation
of acetaminophen and ibuprofen in febrile children cannot safely be recommended
at this time. Instead, nurses and other health care providers are strongly
encouraged to use only one single antipyretic medication in febrile children
and to ensure that the child is receiving an age-appropriate, therapeutic, and
safe dose. If these three factors are guaranteed, the child is likely to
achieve adequate antipyresis. However, if the use of either acetaminophen or
ibuprofen is not effective and if additional nonpharmacological methods of
fever reduction have also failed, the practitioner is encouraged to proceed
with caution when recommending alternating antipyretic therapy. Finally, no
matter which antipyretics are prescribed, the nurse or other health care
provider must ensure that parents understand the appropriate dose as well as
dosing schedule and that they have been given clear, written instructions
regarding the management of their febrile child. It is only by ensuring the
accuracy of instructions and the under-standing of the parents that the
potential for harm to the child can be reduced and ultimate fever reduction can
be achieved.
The Evidence-Based Practice section focuses on the
search for and critique of the best evidence to answer challenging clinical
questions so that the highest quality, up-to-date care can be provided to
children and their families. To submit questions or obtain author guidelines,
contact Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, PhD, RN-CS, PNP; Section Editor; University
of Rochester School of Nursing; 601 Elmwood Avenue; Box SON; Rochester, NY
14642; (716) 275-8903; bernadette_melnyk@urmc.rochester.edu
Adam, D., & Stankov, G. (1994). Treatment of fever
in childhood. European Journal of Pediatrics, 153, 394-402.
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). (2001).
Acetaminophen toxicity in children. Pediatrics, 108, 1020-1024.
Bachur, R. (2001). Fever: Approach to the febrile
child. In C. Green-Hernandez, J.K. Singleton, & D.Z. Aronzon (Eds.),
Primary care pediatrics (pp. 343-357). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Bein, J.P., & Heubi, J.E. (1997). Ibuprofen and/or
acetaminophen: What price for euthermia ? [Letter to the Editor Reply]. The
Journal of Pediatrics, 131, 332.
Block, S. (1997). Ibuprofen and/or acetaminophen: What
price for euthermia ? [Letter to the Editor]. The Journal of Pediatrics, 131,
332-333.
Greisman, L.A., & Mackowiak, P.A. (2002). Fever: Beneficial and detrimental effects of antipyretics. Current
Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 15, 241-245.
Grover, G. (1996). Fever and bacteremia. In C.D.
Berkowitz (Ed.), Pediatrics: A primary care approach (pp. 127-131).
Philadelphia: W .B. Saunders Company.
Hay, W., Groothius, J.R., Hayward, A.R., & Levin,
M.J. (1997). Current pediatric diagnosis and treatment (13th ed.). Stanford, CT: Appleton & Lange.
Kauffman, R.E., Sawyer, L.A., & Scheinbaum, M.L. (1992). Antipyretic efficacy of ibuprofen vs. acetaminophen.
American Journal of Diseases of Children, 146, 622-625.
Kearns, G.L., Leeder, J.S., & Wasserman, G.S. (1998). Combined antipyretic therapy: Another potential source
of chronic acetaminophen toxicity [Letter to the Editor Reply]. The Journal of
Pediatrics, 133, 713.
Kelley, M.T., Walson, P.D., Edge, J.H., Cox, S., &
Mortensen, M.E. (1992). Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ibuprofen
isomers and acetaminophen in febrile children. Clinical Pharmacology &
Therapeutics, 52, 181-189.
Kramer, M.S., Naimark, L., & Leduc, D.G. (1985).
Parental fever phobia and its correlates. Pediatrics, 75, 110-113.
Lau, A.S., Uba, A., & Lehman, D. (2002).
Infectious diseases. In A.M. Rudolph, R.K. Kamei, & K.J. Overby (Eds.),
Rudolph s fundamentals of pediatrics (3rd ed.) (pp. 311-320). New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Mayoral, C.E., Marino, R.V., Rosenfeld, W., &
Greensher, J. (2000). Alternating antipyretics: Is this an alternative?
Pediatrics, 105, 1009-1012.
McIntire, S.C., Rubenstein, R.C., Gartner, J.C.,
Gilboa, N., & Ellis, D. (1993). Acute flank pain and reversible renal
dysfunction associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use.
Pediatrics, 92, 459-460.
Mofenson, H.C., McFee, R., Caraccio, T., &
Greensher, J. (1998). Combined antipyretic therapy: Another potential source of
chronic acetaminophen toxicity [Letter to the Editor]. The Journal of
Pediatrics, 133, 712-713.
Murphy, K.A. (1992). Acetaminophen and ibuprofen:
Fever control and overdose. Pediatric Nursing, 18, 428-432.
Plaisance, K.I. (2000). Toxicities of drugs used in
the management of fever.Clinical Infectious Diseases, 31, S219-S223.
Polit, D.F., & Hungler, B.P. (1999). Nursing research: principles and methods (6th ed.). Philadelphia:
Lippincott.
Schmitt, B.D. (1980). Fever phobia. American Journal
of Diseases of Children, 134, 176-181.
Schnaiderman, D., Laht, E., Sheefer, T., &
Aladjem, M. (1993). Antipyretic effectiveness of acetaminophen in febrile
seizures: ongoing prophylaxis versus sporadic usage. European Journal of
Pediatrics, 152, 747-749.
Steele, R.W., Yong, F.S.H., Bass, J.W., & Shirkey,
H.C. (1972). Oral antipyretic therapy: Evaluation of aspirin-acetaminophen
combination. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 123, 204-206.
Van Stuijvenberg, M., Derksen-Lubsen, G., Steyerberg,
E.W., Habbema, J.D., & Moll, H.A. (1998). Randomized controlled trial of
ibuprofen syrup administered during febrile illnesses to prevent febrile
seizure recurrences. Pediatrics, 102, E51.
Walson, P.D.,
Galletta, G., Braden, N.J., & Alexander, L. (1989). Ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and placebo treatment of
febrile children. Clinical Pharmacology Therapeutics, 46, 9-17.
Wong, A., Sibbald, A., Ferrero, F., Plager, M.,
Santolaya, M.E., Escobar,A.M., et al. (2001). Antipyretic effects of dipyrone
versus ibuprofen versus acetaminophen in children: Results of a multi-national,
randomized, modified double-blind study. Clinical Pediatrics, 40, 313-324.
External validity -The degree to which the results of the study can be generalized from
the sample group to the study population.
Generalizability -The ability of the results of the study to be extended from the sample
group to the study population. Interviewer bias -The level of error or bias
introduced into a study as a result of normal human interaction between the
inter-viewer and the respondent.
Nonresponse bias -The level of error or bias introduced into a study as the result of a
nonrandom subset of people who fail to participate in the study when asked.
Reliability -The consistency with which an instrument measures what it is supposed
to measure over time (i.e., a scale consistently measures weight at the same
number).
Respondent bias -The level of error introduced into a study as a result of the tendency
of participants to respond to questions in the same way (i.e., always
disagreeing or agreeing), no matter what the question asks. Often occurs due to
the participant s desire to please the researchers or interviewer.
Selection bias -Threat to the internal validity of the study due to the differences
that exist between the groups of people who choose to participate versus those
who choose not to participate in the study.
Validity -The degree to
which an instrument measures the concept being measured; the accuracy of an
instrument (i.e., pain scale measures pain rather than anxiety).
Note: Adapted from
Polit & Hungler (1999).
Acknowledgements
The author would like to acknowledge Myra Huth, PdD,
RN, Research Associate at the Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Jane B. Petit
Pain and Palliative Care Center, Milwaukee, WI, for her editorial assistance on
this article.
Sheri M. Carson, MSN, RN,
CPN, PNP, is a Pediatric Nurse II at Children s Hospital of
Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, a member of the Society of Pediatric Nurses, the
National Association of the Pediatric Nurse Practitioners, and the NCBPNP/N
Certified Pediatric Nurse Self-Assessment Exercise Development Committee.